<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Kim-Ee Yeoh comments my reading
suggestion:<br>
<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAPY+ZdSUbdusEeowBFMoPBrQN7K32pkfL9zWLmoqzr6H7jyEkQ@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_extra">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div id=":1n3" style="overflow:hidden">"Indiscrete Thoughts"
by Gian-Carlo Rota, published by Birkhäuser in 1997.
Available on the Web. [I forgot where]<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
</div>
<div class="gmail_extra">I'm rather fond of Rota's two volumes
of musings. For the purpose of furthering the quality of
philosophizing, would it not be better served citing the
relevant chapters, if not the actual page numbers?<br>
<br>
</div>
<div class="gmail_extra">As you took note, the book covers a
swathe of topics.<br>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
Shall I also give the line numbers, Kim-Ee? The book of Rota is
divided into parts and chapters, with titles. It is not so difficult
to find quickly that something may (or not) interest you. What is a
"relevant" chapter in a collection of philosophical essays?<br>
<br>
You might skip the "biographies" of some mathematicians, with some
unpleasant fragments, if you are not interested. <br>
I liked a few others.<br>
<br>
Part II, Ch. VII: "The Pernicious Influence of Mathematics Upon
Philosophy" is an inspired attack addressed at the "analytical
philosophers" who felt really offended! (This is a reprint from the
Journal of Metaphysics, published also in the book "18
Unconventional Essays on the Nature of Mathematics", Springer, ed.
by Reuben Hersh. I also recommend it [also on the Web], it is
plenty of serious wisdom, although sometimes hard to read.) <br>
This chapter deals with the non-philosophical essence of logic, with
the "philosophical vacuity" of formal definitions. Very inspiring.<br>
<br>
For Rota the question of IDENTITY is more important than that of
EXISTENCE. The chapter XII: "Syntax, Semantics, and the Problem of
the Identity of Mathematical Items" (p. 151) begins his presentation
of the subject, which continues later. Rota exposes some reasoning
based on his favourite philosophical topic, the phenomenology,
continuing previous sections. This may not convince you (e.g. if you
are an orthodox materialist...), but you might learn something.<br>
<br>
The chapter about /Fundierung/ (XV, p. 172) in which Rota fights
against the reductionism, may give you a headache. But you should
survive.<br>
<br>
<br>
Anyway, /a ciascuno il suo/.<br>
<br>
Jerzy K.<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>