[Haskell-cafe] type-class and subclasses
Andreas Källberg
anka.213 at gmail.com
Thu Apr 10 08:41:59 UTC 2025
GADTs does indeed resolve the issue in this specific case, as in that case the constructor carries the evidence of the equality constraint. However if we for example wanted to add a constructor method to your pair class:
class Pair pt where
-- …
mkPair :: u -> v -> pt u v
then it would no longer work, as you no longer have a pt in the arguments that carries the equality proof between u and v.
If you want it to work in that case, then one option is that you could add a constraint-kinded type parameter to your class, which lets instances specify custom constraints to the type variables:
class Pair c pt where
mkPair :: c u v => u -> v -> pt u v
instance Pair (~) Ptype where
-- …
this can however lead to issues with ambiguous types, since users of the type class methods needs to know the constraint to decide which instance to use. We can resolve this either using functional dependencies or type families:
class PairFunDep c pt | pt -> c where
mkPair :: c u v => u -> v -> pt u v
instance PairFunDep (~) Ptype where
-- …
class PairTypeFam pt where
type PairConstraint pt :: u -> v -> Constraint
mkPair :: PairConstraint pt u v => u -> v -> pt u v
instance PairTypeFam Ptype where
type PairConstraint Ptype u v = u ~ v
-- …
Regards,
Anka
> On 10 Apr 2025, at 04:33, lloyd allison <proflandy at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I have a general question:
> I would like to have a type-class C in which types that are instances of C have some type parameters and then a subclass S of C where some of the type parameters of an instance of S are more constrained in some way -- perhaps by being equal and/or being instances of some other class.
>
> I have an entirely artificial example (att.) that illustrates this situation and struggled (it's a while since I wrote much Haskell) to get it past the ghc type checker until stumbling across GADTs which do seem to do the trick, so I could leave it at that but...
> ...I am very far from sure that this is the correct way to look at the problem and am hoping for some illumination.
>
> regards
> Lloyd.
> --
> No AI was used in composing this message.
>
>
> <eg.hs>
> _______________________________________________
> Haskell-Cafe mailing list
> To (un)subscribe, modify options or view archives go to:
> http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
> Only members subscribed via the mailman list are allowed to post.
More information about the Haskell-Cafe
mailing list