[Haskell-cafe] GPT & Haskell

[Tom Ellis]

I never thought I would see Time publish an article advocating that
"allied nuclear countries [should be] willing to run some risk of
nuclear exchange if that’s what it takes to reduce the risk of large
AI training runs", written by a man who didn't go to high school.

Tom



On Sat, Apr 01, 2023 at 01:51:54PM +0200, MigMit wrote:
> Or this: https://time.com/6266923/ai-eliezer-yudkowsky-open-letter-not-enough/
> 
> (to which somebody said "I work in a datacenter. So far no AI threatened violence on me; Yudkowsky just did")
> 
> > On 1 Apr 2023, at 13:36, Aloïs Cochard <alois.cochard at gmail.com> wrote:
> > 
> > I don't know, personally I could not stop laughing at the answer from version 3.5... it's so freaking stupid!
> > 
> > But if like Dominik you are scared after reading that part you might be interested to look into:
> > https://futureoflife.org/open-letter/pause-giant-ai-experiments/
> > 
> > On Sat, 1 Apr 2023 at 11:44, Dominik Schrempf <dominik.schrempf at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Well, it seems like GPT4 gets most of the questions right. This was more of a scary read than a funny one to me!
> > 
> > Dominik
> > 
> > On April 1, 2023 8:18:08 AM GMT+02:00, "Aloïs Cochard" <alois.cochard at gmail.com> wrote:
> >How can this be useful when you have to anyway review everything is doing as he might to just randomly insert a bug or a security flaw???
> > I prefer to read poems by my human friends.
> > 
> > I highly recommend starting reading this paper at page 128 instead of wasting your time on that prompt:
> > https://arxiv.org/pdf/2303.12712.pdf
> > 
> > Be ready for a good laugh