[Haskell-cafe] Hidden types and scope
ben.franksen at online.de
Thu Jul 11 15:11:09 UTC 2019
Am 10.07.19 um 18:03 schrieb Sandeep.C.R via Haskell-Cafe:
>>What is the reason case and let expressions are treated differently in
> this case
> Please check the section "126.96.36.199. Restrictions section" in
> It says,
>>In general, you can only pattern-match on an existentially-quantified
> constructor in a case expression or in the patterns of a function
> definition. The reason for this restriction is really an implementation
> one. Type-checking binding groups is already a nightmare without
> existentials complicating the picture. Also an existential pattern
> binding at the top level of a module doesn't make sense, because it's
> not clear how to prevent the existentially-quantified type "escaping".
> So for now, there's a simple-to-state restriction. We'll see how
> annoying it is.
FWIW, I personally do find the restriction pretty annoying (even though
by now I am quite used to it).
In some cases one can work around it by using pattern guards instead of
let/where, since these are also exempt.
More information about the Haskell-Cafe