[Haskell-cafe] Why are && and || right-associative?
jo at durchholz.org
Sat Apr 13 12:29:06 UTC 2019
Am 13.04.19 um 12:14 schrieb Richard O'Keefe:
> I would
> be astonished if you had been told that
> a ** b ** c
> was defined to be
> a ** (b ** c)
> back in 1950-something,
Actually we were told, with the reasoning that (a ** b) ** c is the same
as a ** (b * c), I recall that that was presented as "nothing new there
so not worth defining it that way).
Truth be told, that was the 1970-something for me.
More information about the Haskell-Cafe