[Haskell-cafe] the purpose of QuickCheck's size parameter
Oliver Charles
ollie at ocharles.org.uk
Sun Jun 17 10:28:32 UTC 2018
Is SmallCheck more principles in this regard, or would people consider that
equally hacky?
On Sun, 17 Jun 2018, 10:18 am Petr Pudlák, <petr.mvd at gmail.com> wrote:
> PS: Just to make clear, it's not that I have something against QuickCheck
> or similar libraries, on the contrary, they're great! I'm just playing the
> devil's advocate to analyze and understand the concept.
>
> ne 17. 6. 2018 v 4:05 odesílatel Oleg Grenrus <oleg.grenrus at iki.fi>
> napsal:
>
>> Not only avoid extremely large trees, but in general guarantee
>> termination of the generation process
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> On 15 Jun 2018, at 0.31, David Feuer <david.feuer at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> data Foo a = Leaf a | Node [Foo a]
>>
>> Without the size parameter, it's a bit tricky to control the distribution
>> to avoid generating extremely large trees. I certainly agree, however, that
>> the size parameter is an ugly and ill-specified hack.
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 14, 2018, 4:20 PM Petr Pudlák <petr.mvd at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi everyone,
>>>
>>> I'd like to better understand the principles behind the 'size'
>>> parameter. Looking at quickCheckWithResult [1], its computation seems to be
>>> somewhat non-trivial, or even arbitrary. As far as I understand it, the
>>> size is varied throughout tests, increasing from small to larger values. I
>>> see two main purposes:
>>>
>>> - Test on smaller as well as larger values. But with generators having
>>> proper distribution of values, this should happen anyway, just as if we had
>>> a constant, larger 'size' parameter.
>>> - Starting with smaller sizes allows to find smaller count-examples
>>> first. But with shrinking, it doesn't matter that much, big
>>> counter-examples are shrunk to smaller ones anyway in most cases.
>>>
>>> So is this parameter actually necessary? Would anything change
>>> considerably if it was dropped?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Petr
>>>
>>> [1]
>>> http://hackage.haskell.org/package/QuickCheck-2.11.3/docs/src/Test-QuickCheck-Test.html#quickCheckWithResult
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Haskell-Cafe mailing list
>>> To (un)subscribe, modify options or view archives go to:
>>> http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
>>> Only members subscribed via the mailman list are allowed to post.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Haskell-Cafe mailing list
>> To (un)subscribe, modify options or view archives go to:
>> http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
>> Only members subscribed via the mailman list are allowed to post.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
> Haskell-Cafe mailing list
> To (un)subscribe, modify options or view archives go to:
> http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
> Only members subscribed via the mailman list are allowed to post.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/haskell-cafe/attachments/20180617/440b5766/attachment.html>
More information about the Haskell-Cafe
mailing list