[Haskell-cafe] Foldable for (,)

[Bardur Arantsson]

On 2017-05-03 19:11, Andrey Sverdlichenko wrote:
> This is probably twentieth time this question arises. Discussion quickly
> boils down to people liking convenient syntax sugar Foldable instance
> gives (traverse pair, etc), versus people who don't like absurd semantic
> which becomes correct with such instances.

Language like "absurd semantic" perpetuates the negativity/confrontation
that Gershom was talking about. Please try to avoid such language.

(It's absolutely fine to disagree, but phrasing matters.)

Regards,