[Haskell-cafe] can this be done with stack?

[Dennis Raddle]

Thanks, I'll take a look at this and get back to you if I have any
questions.
D

On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 11:27 PM, Michael Snoyman <michael at snoyman.com>
wrote:

> Have you tried `stack ghc filename.hs`? Also, you could try the script
> interpreter approach, with something like this:
>
> #!/usr/bin/env stack
> -- stack --resolver lts-8.12 script --compile
> main = putStrLn "Hello World"
>
> Running `stack filename.hs` will compile and run your file, and you can
> reuse the resulting executable.
>
> On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 9:03 AM, Dennis Raddle <dennis.raddle at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Using stack, but I have a need to build lots of executables. **lots** and
>> new ones all the time .. my application is music playback. I used to have a
>> single executable for playing music, and used it for all compositions. I
>> later found that I needed to do a lot of configuration specific to each
>> composition, and that the most natural language for specifying all the data
>> and functions specific to a composition was Haskell. That means I have a
>> source file for every composition, in the same directory where I store that
>> composition (as a Sibelius file). But a couple things. (1) they aren't in
>> the stack tree, (2) I don't want to add every one of these to a cabal file.
>>
>> What is the best way to approach this goal?
>>
>> D
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Haskell-Cafe mailing list
>> To (un)subscribe, modify options or view archives go to:
>> http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
>> Only members subscribed via the mailman list are allowed to post.
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/haskell-cafe/attachments/20170602/1c4dd784/attachment-0001.html>