[Haskell-cafe] Lenses and records and ecosystem
anthony_clayden at clear.net.nz
Fri Feb 10 05:35:13 UTC 2017
I see Simon PJ's comment here
and the lengthy discussions from different advocates.
How much is it true there's a fractured "Haskell ecosystem"
with 2 (3?) incompatible approaches:
* H98 style labelled records with various extensions to ease
* newtype-wrapped Lenses
* 'raw' (unwrapped) Lenses
Can you mix those three styles inside one program? How much
pain does it cause?
Can you import libraries with a mix of styles? How does a
I see the plethora of operators Lenses come with
(mostly to keep the types coherent?).
Except that Lens composition is plain function composition
I remember something from SPJ's video/lecture on Lenses:
that having Lens composition turn out to be function
composition is "cute".
That suggests to me it's more of a happy accident than a
I also see in the ORF proposal, OverloadedLabels part,
that composing with Control.Category.(.) can lead to type
Could there be a dedicated operator for composing Lenses,
that has the same semantics as (.),
but a more specialised type?
To strengthen type inference/reduce ambiguity.
More information about the Haskell-Cafe