[Haskell-cafe] Why did the number of LOC in GHC nearly triple in 2014!?
Edward Kmett
ekmett at gmail.com
Wed Oct 5 18:31:08 UTC 2016
If I had to guess, I'd say that was likely around when Austin was playing
with the way we handle submodules. There was a bunch of churn on that front
in 2013-2014 or so.
-Edward
On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 2:26 PM, Dimitri DeFigueiredo <
defigueiredo at ucdavis.edu> wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
> I was looking at this:
>
> https://www.openhub.net/p/ghc/analyses/latest/languages_summary
>
> And was really surprised by the graph. Is this correct!?
> Did the complexity of GHC's codebase significantly increase in 2014?
> Can anybody shed a light on why that is?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Dimitri
>
> --
> 2E45 D376 A744 C671 5100 A261 210B 8461 0FB0 CA1F
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Haskell-Cafe mailing list
> To (un)subscribe, modify options or view archives go to:
> http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
> Only members subscribed via the mailman list are allowed to post.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/haskell-cafe/attachments/20161005/954a8959/attachment.html>
More information about the Haskell-Cafe
mailing list