[Haskell-cafe] New type of ($) operator in GHC 8.0 is problematic

Tom Ellis tom-lists-haskell-cafe-2013 at jaguarpaw.co.uk
Fri Feb 5 19:19:25 UTC 2016

On Fri, Feb 05, 2016 at 01:13:23PM -0500, Richard Eisenberg wrote:
> We're in a bit of a bind in all this. We really need the fancy type for
> ($) so that it can be used in all situations where it is used currently. 

Is there a list of situations where ($) is used currently that give rise to
this need?

More information about the Haskell-Cafe mailing list