[Haskell-cafe] Which is the most "hackable" compiler?
monkleyon at googlemail.com
Fri Aug 12 19:58:52 UTC 2016
So I have some crazy ideas for language extensions/reinterpretations and
ways I might try to implement them. But ghc is a complex beast and my
crazy ideas have too many interrelationships for a noob like me to try
to bold them onto it. After all, I have never worked on ghc - or any
compiler for that matter. I did look at the code, but I reckon maybe I
should gather some experience first before diving into that one. It
would be even worse to offload my ideas onto someone else before I at
least tried them and got some feedback. No fun for anyone.
But of course I don't want to start from scratch. As fun as that could
be, there's no need to reinvent all the wheels just for a different
axle. And I hear rumors that there are other Haskell compilers out
there, even if most of them live in the shadow/slipstream of their
brother. Alas, I don't have any idea what their statuses and
So maybe you can help me here: Have you experienced any of the
alternative compilers as especially easy for a newcomer to pick up and
play around with? If it helps, I would be satisfied with plain
Haskell2010 or even Haskell 98, although some GADT and/or TypeFamilies
code to butcher would be nice, too. The ideas are mostly about larger
scale structures like whole functions. One representative example idea
is "Could it help the implementation - and does it even make sense - to
view a module as just a weirdly written zero parameter type class?" As I
said: crazy ideas.
I'm thankful for any thoughts and ideas.
More information about the Haskell-Cafe