[Haskell-cafe] Benchmarking harnesses for a more modern nofib?

Ryan Newton rrnewton at gmail.com
Mon Apr 4 20:35:26 UTC 2016


Great!  I'm glad to hear folks are interested.

It sounds like there is need for a better low-dependencies benchmark
suite.  I was just grepping through nofib looking for things that are
*missing* and I realized there are no uses of atomicModifyIORef, for
example.

What we're working on at Indiana right this second is not quite this
effort, but is the separate, complementary, effort to gather as much data
as possible from a large swath of packages (high dependency-count) .

Note that fibon already has bitrotted, and does not quite work any
> more. So there is some low hanging fruit in resurrecting that one.
>

Agreed.  Though I see that nofib already contains some of them.

Even though stack + GHC head loses many of stack's benefits, I think that
stack and cabal freeze should make it easier to keep things running for the
long term than it was with fibon (which bitrotted quickly).


> Another important step in that direction would be to define a common
> output for benchmark suites defined in .cabal files, so it is easier to
> set up things like http://perf.haskell.org/ghc and http://perf.haskell.
> org/binary for these projects.
>

Yes, exitcode-stdio-1.0 is useful for testing but not so much for
benchmarking.  To attempt to harvest Stackage benchmarks we were going to
just assume things are criterion and catch errors as we go.  Should we go
further and aim to standardize a new value for "type:" within benchmark
suites?

About the harness: haskell.org is currently paying a student (CCed) to
> setup a travis-like infrastructure based on gipeda (the software behind
> perf.haskell.org) that would allow library authors to very simply get
> continuous benchmark measurements. Let’s see what comes out of that!
>

What's the infrastructure that currently gathers the data for
perf.haskell.org?  Is there a repo you can point to?  (Since gipeda itself
is just the presentation layer, and something else must be running things &
gathering data.)

Cheers,
 -Ryan
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/haskell-cafe/attachments/20160404/0a1e444e/attachment.html>


More information about the Haskell-Cafe mailing list