[Haskell-cafe] MonadFix wiki confusion
Albert Y. C. Lai
trebla at vex.net
Fri Oct 30 20:41:34 UTC 2015
On 2015-10-22 11:29 PM, Samuel Rødal wrote:
> I agree that the only laziness that's needed is to not evaluate s, and
> making the tree strict in the original code doesn't cause that as the
> tuple is still lazy. I just thought the article could be a bit more
> explicit about that to avoid confusion.
Tomorrow I'm going to make this change: delete the strict version of
BTree, and just say that the only laziness needed is the laziness in s,
and that "$! s" breaks it.
More information about the Haskell-Cafe