[Haskell-cafe] MonadFix wiki confusion

[Albert Y. C. Lai]

On 2015-10-22 11:29 PM, Samuel Rødal wrote:
> I agree that the only laziness that's needed is to not evaluate s, and 
> making the tree strict in the original code doesn't cause that as the 
> tuple is still lazy. I just thought the article could be a bit more 
> explicit about that to avoid confusion. 

Tomorrow I'm going to make this change: delete the strict version of 
BTree, and just say that the only laziness needed is the laziness in s, 
and that "$! s" breaks it.