[Haskell-cafe] Monad of no `return` Proposal (MRP): Moving `return` out of `Monad`

[David Thomas]

No, and I'm not sure just how well existing Hackage tooling/process
matches the workflow (due mostly to ignorance of existing Hackage
tooling/process).  To the degree that there's a mismatch, it may have
reason sufficient to abandon the approach - or it may suggest
improvements to tooling/process.

On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 3:05 PM, Taru Karttunen <taruti at taruti.net> wrote:
> On 08.10 14:12, David Thomas wrote:
>> Right.  With a nest of #ifdefs, you still have the same number of
>> branches (at least - there may be some combinations of options that
>> you don't support and it won't be obvious), they're just implicit and
>> harder to work with.
>
> Have you got an example of a library that works with branches
> for GHC-versions while maintaining feature-parity across
> branches with a versioning scheme that works in practice with
> Hackage?
>
> - Taru Karttunen