[Haskell-cafe] Darcs vs Git

[Francesco Ariis]

On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 08:10:47PM +0000, Mike Meyer wrote:
> Since we're talking about this, ones is the reasons I dislike for is that
> it treats the project history just like any other prolix public document,
> providing tools for modifying it, changing it as you push or pull, etc. I
> disagree with this, and prefer tools that believe that history should be
> immutable, like hg and fossil.
> 
> Which side, if either, of this does darcs land on?

darcs has some tools to "rebase". I would say they are seldom used in a
typical workflow (for sure less than what I saw in typical git usage),
but they are there.