[Haskell-cafe] RFC: "Native -XCPP" Proposal
tomas.carnecky at gmail.com
Thu May 7 21:15:47 UTC 2015
That doesn't mean those people don't exist. Maybe they do but are too
afraid to speak up (due to corporate policy or whatever).
On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 10:41 PM, Malcolm Wallace <malcolm.wallace at me.com>
> I also note that in this discussion, so far not a single person has said
> that the cpphs licence would actually be a problem for them.
> On 7 May 2015, at 20:54, Herbert Valerio Riedel wrote:
> > On 2015-05-06 at 13:38:16 +0200, Jan Stolarek wrote:
> > [...]
> >> Regarding licensing issues: perhaps we should simply ask Malcolm
> >> Wallace if he would consider changing the license for the sake of GHC?
> >> Or perhaps he could grant a custom-tailored license to the GHC
> >> project? After all, the project page  says: " If that's a problem
> >> for you, contact me to make other arrangements."
> > Fyi, Neil talked to him:
> > | I talked to Malcolm. His contention is that it doesn't actually change
> > | the license of the ghc package. As such, it's just a single extra
> > | license to add to a directory full of licenses, which is no big deal.
> > :
> Haskell-Cafe mailing list
> Haskell-Cafe at haskell.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Haskell-Cafe