[Haskell-cafe] Proposal: Shorter Import Syntax
_deepfire at feelingofgreen.ru
Wed Jun 3 21:11:20 UTC 2015
Anthony Cowley <acowley at seas.upenn.edu> writes:
> On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 2:45 PM, Kosyrev Serge
> <_deepfire at feelingofgreen.ru> wrote:
>> Then wouldn't it also make sense to also:
>> 1. eliminate the arguably confusing double-import through as-without-qualified:
>> import FQMN as M .. (which imports the exportlist of FQMN twice)
>> Does a lot of code use that? Is this a good practice? Do we want
>> to encourage this kind of usage?
>> 2. and take advantage of the reduced complexity by implying
>> "qualified", wheneved "as" is present, by replacing:
>> import qualified FQMN as M …
>> import FQMN as M …
>> 3. effectively drop the "qualified" keyword from use (can be done lazily)
>> It would break things, though.
> This (2) is what I would want to do, too, ideally. However, the
> breakage really makes it inviable.
> I tried to quantify the use of the other syntax in another email. I
> grepped through the source of all the packages in the Stackage Nightly
> package set and found that less 0.3% of imports use that syntax. It's
> a small number, but it's not zero, so the breakage would be
One can look at it this way -- the breakage is a fixed, one-time cost,
whereas the confusion has a running cost.
So in the end, the real question is what is our planning horizon.
More information about the Haskell-Cafe