[Haskell-cafe] Type systems preventing laziness-related memory leaks?
Joe Hillenbrand
joehillen at gmail.com
Wed Feb 18 15:40:11 UTC 2015
Is foldl = foldl' ever going to happen?
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 11:50 PM, Roman Cheplyaka <roma at ro-che.info> wrote:
> Note that foldr (+) 0 has nothing to do with laziness — it's eager. Its
> problem is that it's not tail-recursive.
>
> foldl (+) 0 would be an example of a laziness issue.
>
> If you want to specify which functions should or shouldn't be used in a
> lazy context, take a look at polarity (see Harper's Practical
> Foundations for Programming Languages). So you could say, for instance,
> that it doesn't make sense to use + in a lazy context; that'd eliminate
> half the cases of laziness-induced memory leaks in practice.
>
> If instead you want to impose some upper bound on the memory consumption
> without caring about specific cases, then see this ICFP'12 paper:
> http://www.dcc.fc.up.pt/~pbv/AALazyExtended.pdf
>
> On 18/02/15 07:04, Eugene Kirpichov wrote:
> > Hello haskell-cafe,
> >
> > Let me repost here a question I posted to cstheory stackexchange - in
> > hopes that there are more type theory experts here.
> >
> >
> http://cstheory.stackexchange.com/questions/29518/type-systems-preventing-laziness-related-memory-leaks
> >
> > Perhaps the main source of performance problems in Haskell is when a
> > program inadvertently builds up a thunk of unbounded depth - this causes
> > both a memory leak and a potential stack overflow when evaluating. The
> > classic example is defining sum = foldr (+) 0 in Haskell.
> >
> > Are there any type systems which statically enforce lack of such thunks
> > in a program using a lazy language?
> >
> > Seems like this should be on the same order of difficulty as proving
> > other static program properties using type system extensions, e.g. some
> > flavors of thread safety or memory safety.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Haskell-Cafe mailing list
> Haskell-Cafe at haskell.org
> http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/haskell-cafe/attachments/20150218/f0a9c55d/attachment.html>
More information about the Haskell-Cafe
mailing list