[Haskell-cafe] Q: language-c upstream repo (fwd)
Ivan Zakharyaschev
imz at altlinux.org
Tue Dec 22 09:59:27 UTC 2015
Hi, Benedikt!
Thanks for your reply clarifying these things.
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2015 05:59:17 +0000
> From: Benedikt Huber <benedikt.huber at gmail.com>
> the hub.darcs.net repository is a mirror of
> http://code.haskell.org/language-c (the official upstream) that was created
> to simplify contributing.
> Conversion to darcs-2 was not straightforward IIRC, and the update of the
> repository did not work out.That's why code.haskell.org is still darcs-1.
To be able to push to hub.darcs.net, I've done the conversion with "darcs
convert darcs-2" with the help of the advices from darcs developers --
after a "darcs optimize reorder", and the resulting darcs-2 repo had no
problems with pushing to (a clone of) your darcs-2 repo at hub.darcs.net.
(Although one thing that still appears strange to me is that some tags
were lost in my result of the conversion, but not in your darcs-2 repo.
I've described all this in the previous messages in this thread.)
Anyway, now, this darcs-2 mirror of the upstream code.haskell.org darcs-1
repo is at http://hub.darcs.net/imz/language-c_hackage
It is "compatible" with your darcs-2 repo at hub.darcs.net, and compared
to it has 2 extra patches. These are the last two changes in the
"official upstream" darcs-1 repo (they are from December 2014).
> Ivan Zakharyaschev <imz at altlinux.org> schrieb am So., 20. Dez. 2015 um
> 16:32 Uhr:
> I've been interested in hacking language-c library a bit for my needs.
> (If
> it turns out useful and successful, I'll tell about it.)
>
> And I've cloned the repo listed at
> https://hackage.haskell.org/package/language-c-0.4.7 , namely:
> http://code.haskell.org/language-c
>
> Apart from my special hacks, I've also fixed some typos and so on.
>
> But then I discovered that if I want to publish them on hub.darcs.net
> , I
> need a darcs-2 repo, and the initial one which I used for cloning is
> a darcs-1 repo.
>
> I could do the conversion to darcs-2, but I read that it is not
> reproducible: run several times on the same set of patches it will
> give
> different results.
>
> As I've discovered also a language-c repo at hub.darcs.net which looks
> like an upstream repo: http://hub.darcs.net/visq/language-c , I'm in
> doubt
> whether I should continue making my patches against the darcs-1 repo
> which
> is said to be upstream at hackage or against
> http://hub.darcs.net/visq/language-c whichis not officially declared
> as
> the upstream but looks more fresh.
>
> ..if I want to be able to send some of my patches upstream.
Best regards,
Ivan
More information about the Haskell-Cafe
mailing list