[Haskell-cafe] an idea for modifiyng data/newtype syntax: use `::=` instead of `=`
_deepfire at feelingofgreen.ru
Sat Aug 8 23:50:03 UTC 2015
Will Yager <will.yager at gmail.com> writes:
> Obviously a change like this would be horribly destructive to existing code, and
> for relatively little benefit.
Hidden behind a pragma -- is it really that horribly destructive?
> There are much larger barriers to understanding Haskell than syntactic
> trivia like the one mentioned here.
Barriers exist at every level of mastery -- the ones that matter are
those present at the exact point of one's progression.
It is, of course, true that at some point the little awkwardness exits the
picture completely -- but for any point of time, there always will be
a nontrivial set of people thinking to themselves -- "what the heck?!".
> It is worth asking, then, if we should record these small aesthetic suggestions
> somewhere for consideration while designing the next major compatibility-breaking
> release of the Haskell specification (Haskell 2020 or what have you).
Now this is exactly the kind of assessment that I have been hoping to hear!
And the idea is that, before the next release of the language
specification, it is possible to experiment with the keyword hidden
behind the pragma -- and should the result prove satisfactory, all that
remains to do is to lift the pragma requirement.
Maybe a unified playground for such tweaks -- XNewSyntax, for example.
Or do people suggest, that it should somehow suddenly materialise in the
next release of the specification, without touching any staging ground?
“And those who were seen dancing were thought to be insane
by those who could not hear the music.”
– Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche
More information about the Haskell-Cafe