[Haskell-cafe] haskell.org
amindfv at gmail.com
amindfv at gmail.com
Tue Apr 21 01:12:15 UTC 2015
As a replacement, what about:
[ n + 10 | n <- [1..9], odd n ]
Pithy and not equivalent to "id" :P
Tom
El Apr 20, 2015, a las 20:47, Tikhon Jelvis <tikhon at jelv.is> escribió:
> Are we constraining the examples to not use any external libraries? I can see why that's a good idea, but it also makes it hard to show something both pithy and useful.
>
> On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 5:22 PM, <amindfv at gmail.com> wrote:
>> While we're at it, the "foldr (:) [] [1,2,3]" example probably isn't going to cause anyone to give away their worldly possessions and dedicate their lives to haskell.
>>
>> Tom
>>
>>
>> El Apr 20, 2015, a las 18:53, Ertugrul Söylemez <ertesx at gmx.de> escribió:
>>
>> > Hi everybody,
>> >
>> > I'd like to note that the prime "sieve" example that is sitting at the
>> > top of the homepage is not a real sieve and will more likely make people
>> > with number theory experience (like me) feel highly irritated rather
>> > than fascinated. A real sieve does not only run a million times (!)
>> > faster and consumes far less memory, but is also much longer, even in
>> > Haskell. Here is a real one:
>> >
>> > <http://lpaste.net/101980>
>> >
>> > I don't want to make a mountain out of a molehill, but please note: If
>> > I'd be new to Haskell, that example would have turned me off, because it
>> > would have hurt my ability to take Haskell programmers seriously. You
>> > can easily promote your tools when you claim that they can build a car
>> > easily, except in reality it's just a toy bicycle.
>> >
>> > It's the same feeling to cryptographers when people call a regular
>> > stream cipher a "one-time pad" and promote it as such. It rings the
>> > "this is snake oil!" alarm bell.
>> >
>> > So I propose to either rename the 'sieve' function to something more
>> > appropriate (like `trialDiv`) or replace the example altogether. I
>> > would suggest an example that truly shows Haskell's strengths. Trial
>> > division search is really just a bad substitute for the more common and
>> > equally inappropriate list quicksort example.
>> >
>> >
>> > Greets,
>> > Ertugrul
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Haskell-Cafe mailing list
>> > Haskell-Cafe at haskell.org
>> > http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
>> _______________________________________________
>> Haskell-Cafe mailing list
>> Haskell-Cafe at haskell.org
>> http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/haskell-cafe/attachments/20150420/0a9077d8/attachment.html>
More information about the Haskell-Cafe
mailing list