[Haskell-cafe] Hackage inconsistent? (pandoc.cabal in 1.13.1)

[Tom Ellis]

On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 12:01:09PM +0100, Peter Simons wrote:
>  > We could as well say that Hackage generates
>  >
>  >   ap-1.0.0.0.1
>  >   ap-1.0.0.0.2  -- for the next dependency fix
> 
> That would be one possible solution, yes. Personally, I think these kind
> of version numbers are a bit silly, so I would prefer to append a tag,
> but I don't feel strongly about that.

How would this be any different from just uploading a new version with an
updated cabal file?