[Haskell-cafe] Monad m => m (Maybe a) -> m (Maybe a) -> m (Maybe a)
f at mazzo.li
Thu Nov 13 10:08:16 UTC 2014
On 13 November 2014 01:23, Chris Wong <lambda.fairy at gmail.com> wrote:
> That's different to Evan's original function.
> Evan's solution short-circuits: it does not execute the second action
> if the first succeeds. But your one runs both actions unconditionally.
> For example, the expression
> try (return $ Just ()) (putStrLn "second action executed" >> return Nothing)
> outputs "second action executed" with your solution, but not with Evan's.
> The lesson is, applicative and monadic composition don't always yield
> the same results.
Applicative and monadic composition *should* be the same, given that
Applicative contains the law
(<*>) = ap
And in fact if we rewrite Andras solution as
try a b = (<|>) <$> a <*> b
It is still broken.
The fact that you find libraries where (<*>) is not ap has been
confusing for me as well :P.
Evan's `try` doesn't use Applicative at all, but short-circuits
manually. For this kind of stuff I usually use MaybeT.
More information about the Haskell-Cafe