[Haskell-cafe] [ANN] anonymous-sums
tikhon at jelv.is
Sat Feb 15 04:02:08 UTC 2014
Yeah, S0 and S1 are probably worth including for the sake of completion. We
don't have a 1-tuple, and I believe that's caused a bit of trouble for
people writing generic libraries. Enough trouble so that somebody wrote a
OneTuple package anyhow.
Of course, S0 is isomorphic to Void and S1 is isomorphic to Identity, but I
don't think that's a big deal especially given that S2 is isomorphic to
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 3:38 PM, Tillmann Rendel <
rendel at informatik.uni-marburg.de> wrote:
> Omari Norman wrote:
> What about S0 and S1?
> Haskell-Cafe mailing list
> Haskell-Cafe at haskell.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Haskell-Cafe