[Haskell-cafe] Unicode Haskell source -- Yippie!
conrad at metadecks.org
Mon Apr 28 01:31:24 UTC 2014
On 28 April 2014 06:57, Ian Tuomi <ian.tuomi at aalto.fi> wrote:
> On 27 Apr 2014, at 19:58, Rustom Mody wrote:
>> If you had the choice would you allow that f-i ligature to be thus
>> confusable with the more normal fi? I probably wouldn't but nobody is
>> asking us and the water that's flowed under the bridge cannot be 'flowed'
>> backwards (to the best of my knowledge!)
>> In case that seems far-fetched consider the scenario:
>> 1. Somebody loads (maybe innocently) the code involving variables like
>> into a 'ligature-happy 'IDE/editor'
>> 2. The editor quietly changes all the fine to ﬁne.
>> 3. Since all those variables are in local scope nothing untoward is
>> 4. Until someone loads it into an 'old-fashioned' editor... and then...
> I develop Hasklig, and have enjoyed the discussion about the pros and cons
> of ligatures in coding fonts. However, I really must protest this line of
> reasoning since it is based on false premises.
> As an opentype feature, ligatures have nothing to do with the 'fi' and
> 'fl' unicode points, (which are legacy only, and heavily discouraged by the
> unicode consortium), or with unicode at all. The encoding of the file could
> be pure ASCII for all the ligatures care. The font used changes how the
> text looks, and nothing else.
> When speaking of special unicode symbols in code, I agree with most
> objections raised against them :)
thanks for hasklig. My first thought when I saw it was that hopefully it
would assuage the annoying promoters of unicode overreach.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Haskell-Cafe