davidleothomas at gmail.com
Fri Oct 18 19:13:40 UTC 2013
With such a big speedup and not a lot of downside, I'd really rather it
wind up central enough to be used in preference to nub wherever possible
(including in base!). Perhaps they can duplicate the minimum functionality
necessary from Data.Set, internally behind the scenes? Alternatively,
maybe we can move nub out of base?
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 11:47 AM, Yitzchak Gale <gale at sefer.org> wrote:
> Niklas Hambüchen wrote:
> > It would need a set in base. I wonder if it was ok to use the Data.Set
> > implementation internally in base, without exposing it.
> Ah yes, this is what stopped previous attempts at getting
> ordNub in.
> The GHC team is very keen on getting more things *out* of base.
> Unless something has changed, getting them to include new things
> in base, even if hidden, would be extremely difficult.
> Adding additional dependencies and maintenance burdens would
> add extra work for the overburdened GHC team and slow the
> GHC release cycle.
> How about adding a module named something like Data.List.Nub
> to containers and putting ordNub in there? Or just go back to the
> idea of putting it in Data.Set.
> Haskell-Cafe mailing list
> Haskell-Cafe at haskell.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Haskell-Cafe