[Haskell-cafe] Fwd: Backward compatibility

[Tom Ellis]

On Sun, May 05, 2013 at 10:46:23PM +0200, Alberto G. Corona  wrote:
> The case of WASH is a pity. Architecturally It was more advanced that many
> recent haskell web frameworks.  The package would have been a success with
> little changes in the DSL syntax.

Could you briefly summarise the difference between WASH's approach and that
of the more recent frameworks?