[Haskell-cafe] Testing invasive proposals with Hackager

[Joachim Breitner]

Hi,

Am Donnerstag, den 13.06.2013, 09:59 +0800 schrieb Niklas Hambüchen:
> In many discussions we make guesses about how much code proposals like
> Functor => Monad would break.
> 
> You can use https://github.com/dterei/Hackager to build all of Hackage
> (preferably in a VM).
> 
> Of course many packages have external dependencies, so I'd like to share
> the following list of packages to save you some time.

Great tool. Does someone have the resources to run it regularly (i.e.
daily), dump the results and the diff-to-previous run somewhere and link
the status (currently building/not building) on the hackage package?
More CI-like data and testing is always good!


How much overlap is there between this tool and stackage?


Greetings,
Joachim

-- 
Joachim “nomeata” Breitner
  mail at joachim-breitner.de • http://www.joachim-breitner.de/
  Jabber: nomeata at joachim-breitner.de  • GPG-Key: 0x4743206C
  Debian Developer: nomeata at debian.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/haskell-cafe/attachments/20130613/da965017/attachment.pgp>