[Haskell-cafe] The state of binary (de)serialization
Alexander Solla
alex.solla at gmail.com
Tue Feb 26 01:51:46 CET 2013
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 11:59 AM, Johan Tibell <johan.tibell at gmail.com>wrote:
>
> There are some blog posts and comments out there about merging cereal
>> and binary, is this what's the goal/going on (cfr runGetIncremental)?
>>
>
> It's most definitely the goal and it's basically done. The only thing I
> don't think we'll adopt from cereal is the instances from container types.
>
Why not? Those instances are useful. Without instances defined in
binary/cereal, pretty much every Happstack (or, better said, every
ixset/acidstate/safecopy stack) user will have to have orphan instances.
Also, cereal has a generic instance. Will the new binary?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/haskell-cafe/attachments/20130225/dc53064f/attachment.htm>
More information about the Haskell-Cafe
mailing list