[Haskell-cafe] performance question
Nicolas Bock
nicolasbock at gmail.com
Tue Feb 12 23:57:37 CET 2013
Thanks so much for your efforts, this really helped!
Thanks again,
nick
On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 11:54 PM, Branimir Maksimovic <bmaxa at hotmail.com>wrote:
> Here is haskell version that is faster than python, almost as fast as c++.
> You need to install bytestring-lexing package for readDouble.
>
> bmaxa at maxa:~/haskell$ time ./printMatrixDecay - < output.txt
> read 16384 matrix elements (128x128 = 16384)
> [0.00e0, 1.00e-8) = 0 (0.00%) 0
> [1.00e-8, 1.00e-7) = 0 (0.00%) 0
> [1.00e-7, 1.00e-6) = 0 (0.00%) 0
> [1.00e-6, 1.00e-5) = 0 (0.00%) 0
> [1.00e-5, 1.00e-4) = 1 (0.01%) 1
> [1.00e-4, 1.00e-3) = 17 (0.10%) 18
> [1.00e-3, 1.00e-2) = 155 (0.95%) 173
> [1.00e-2, 1.00e-1) = 1434 (8.75%) 1607
> [1.00e-1, 1.00e0) = 14777 (90.19%) 16384
> [1.00e0, 2.00e0) = 0 (0.00%) 16384
>
> real 0m0.031s
> user 0m0.028s
> sys 0m0.000s
> bmaxa at maxa:~/haskell$ time ./printMatrixDecay.py - < output.txt
> (-) read 16384 matrix elements (128x128 = 16384)
> [0.00e+00, 1.00e-08) = 0 (0.00%) 0
> [1.00e-08, 1.00e-07) = 0 (0.00%) 0
> [1.00e-07, 1.00e-06) = 0 (0.00%) 0
> [1.00e-06, 1.00e-05) = 0 (0.00%) 0
> [1.00e-05, 1.00e-04) = 1 (0.00%) 1
> [1.00e-04, 1.00e-03) = 17 (0.00%) 18
> [1.00e-03, 1.00e-02) = 155 (0.00%) 173
> [1.00e-02, 1.00e-01) = 1434 (0.00%) 1607
> [1.00e-01, 1.00e+00) = 14777 (0.00%) 16384
> [1.00e+00, 2.00e+00) = 0 (0.00%) 16384
>
> real 0m0.081s
> user 0m0.080s
> sys 0m0.000s
>
> Program follows...
>
> import System.Environment
> import Text.Printf
> import Text.Regex.PCRE
> import Data.Maybe
> import Data.Array.IO
> import Data.Array.Unboxed
> import qualified Data.ByteString.Char8 as B
> import Data.ByteString.Lex.Double (readDouble)
>
> strataBounds :: UArray Int Double
> strataBounds = listArray (0,10) [ 0.0, 1.0e-8, 1.0e-7, 1.0e-6, 1.0e-5,
> 1.0e-4, 1.0e-3, 1.0e-2, 1.0e-1, 1.0, 2.0 ]
>
> newStrataCounts :: IO(IOUArray Int Int)
> newStrataCounts = newArray (bounds strataBounds) 0
>
> main = do
> l <- B.getContents
> let a = B.lines l
> strataCounts <- newStrataCounts
> n <- calculate strataCounts a 0
> let
> printStrataCounts :: IO ()
> printStrataCounts = do
> let s = round $ sqrt (fromIntegral n::Double) :: Int
> printf "read %d matrix elements (%dx%d = %d)\n" n s s n
> printStrataCounts' 0 0
> printStrataCounts' :: Int -> Int -> IO ()
> printStrataCounts' i total
> | i < (snd $ bounds strataBounds) = do
> count <- readArray strataCounts i
> let
> p :: Double
> p = (100.0*(fromIntegral count) ::
> Double)/(fromIntegral n :: Double)
> printf "[%1.2e, %1.2e) = %i (%1.2f%%) %i\n" (strataBounds
> ! i) (strataBounds ! (i+1))
> count p
> (total + count)
> printStrataCounts' (i+1) (total+count)
> | otherwise = return ()
> printStrataCounts
>
> calculate :: IOUArray Int Int -> [B.ByteString] -> Int -> IO Int
> calculate _ [] n = return n
> calculate counts (l:ls) n = do
> let
> a = case getAllTextSubmatches $ l =~ B.pack "matrix.*=
> ([0-9eE.+-]+)$" :: [B.ByteString] of
> [_,v] -> Just (readDouble v) :: Maybe (Maybe
> (Double,B.ByteString))
> _ -> Nothing
> b = (fst.fromJust.fromJust) a
> loop :: Int -> IO()
> loop i
> | i < (snd $ bounds strataBounds) =
> if (b >= (strataBounds ! i)) && (b < (strataBounds !
> (i+1)))
> then do
> c <- readArray counts i
> writeArray counts i (c+1)
> else
> loop (i+1)
> | otherwise = return ()
> if isNothing a
> then
> calculate counts ls n
> else do
> loop 0
> calculate counts ls (n+1)
>
>
> ------------------------------
> From: nicolasbock at gmail.com
> Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2013 12:26:09 -0700
> To: haskell-cafe at haskell.org
> Subject: [Haskell-cafe] performance question
>
> Hi list,
>
> I wrote a script that reads matrix elements from standard input, parses
> the input using a regular expression, and then bins the matrix elements by
> magnitude. I wrote the same script in python (just to be sure :) ) and find
> that the python version vastly outperforms the Haskell script.
>
> To be concrete:
>
> $ time ./createMatrixDump.py -N 128 | ./printMatrixDecay
> real 0m2.655s
> user 0m2.677s
> sys 0m0.095s
>
> $ time ./createMatrixDump.py -N 128 | ./printMatrixDecay.py -
> real 0m0.445s
> user 0m0.615s
> sys 0m0.032s
>
> The Haskell script was compiled with "ghc --make printMatrixDecay.hs".
>
> Could you have a look at the script and give me some pointers as to where
> I could improve it, both in terms of performance and also generally, as I
> am very new to Haskell.
>
> Thanks already,
>
> nick
>
>
> _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list
> Haskell-Cafe at haskell.org
> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/haskell-cafe/attachments/20130212/822c298f/attachment.htm>
More information about the Haskell-Cafe
mailing list