[Haskell-cafe] Equality test between types that returns type-level Bool ?
Gábor Lehel
illissius at gmail.com
Sun Nov 25 16:51:43 CET 2012
On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 9:36 AM, Takayuki Muranushi <muranushi at gmail.com> wrote:
> Is it possible to write
>
> type family SameType a b :: Bool
>
> which returns True if a and b are the same type, and False otherwise?
>
> I encountered this problem when I was practicing promoted lists and
> tuples in ghc-7.6.1. One of my goal for practice is to write more
> "modular" version of extensible-dimensional calculations, and to
> understand whether ghc-7.6.1 is capable of it.
>
> http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/dimensional/0.10.2/doc/html/Numeric-Units-Dimensional-Extensible.html
>
> Some of my attempts:
>
> https://github.com/nushio3/dimensional-tf/blob/master/attic/list-02.hs
> This fails because :==: is not an equality test between a and b, but
> is a equality test within a (promoted) kind.
>
> https://github.com/nushio3/dimensional-tf/blob/master/attic/list-03.hs
> This fails because type instance declarations are not read from top to
> bottom. (not like function declarations.)
>
> https://github.com/nushio3/dimensional-tf/blob/master/attic/map-03.hs
> I could define a lookup using class constraints, but when I use it,
> results in overlapping instances.
>
> So, will somebody teach me which of the following is correct?
>
> * We can write a type family SameType a b :: Bool
> * We cannot do that because of theoretical reason (that leads to
> non-termination etc.)
This is correct. It's not currently possible to have overlapping type
family instances without breaking the soundness of the type system.
There's some work on changing it:
http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/NewAxioms
> * We cannot write SameType, but there are ways to write functions like
> 'filter' and 'merge' , over type-level lists, without using SameType.
Not easily that I know of. There's no way to write a general "else",
"otherwise", "if not", etc. case. You have to explicitly enumerate
every type you want to use it with. It _is_ possible with type classes
and OverlappingInstances, but beyond the trivial cases it tends to
make my head hurt (and there's no way to get a result "out" of a type
class "computation" and into a type family).
>
> Always grateful to your help,
> --
> Takayuki MURANUSHI
> The Hakubi Center for Advanced Research, Kyoto University
> http://www.hakubi.kyoto-u.ac.jp/02_mem/h22/muranushi.html
>
> _______________________________________________
> Haskell-Cafe mailing list
> Haskell-Cafe at haskell.org
> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
--
Your ship was destroyed in a monadic eruption.
More information about the Haskell-Cafe
mailing list