[Haskell-cafe] code length in Haskell, a comparison
Feng, Boqun
abstractionfbq at gmail.com
Tue Nov 20 14:32:24 CET 2012
Why C++ appears twice in the Overall rank?
2012/11/20 Gregory Guthrie <guthrie at mum.edu>
> There is some interesting data in the article at:
>
> Code Length Measured in 14 Languages
>
> http://blog.wolfram.com/2012/11/14/code-length-measured-in-14-languages/
>
> basically comparing program lengths in various languages, and some ensuing
> discussion of how this relates to language expressiveness, etc.
> (He does all of his analysis in Mathematica, which is the goal of the
> article.)
>
> It is interesting to see how well Haskell showed in the data; and it would
> also be interesting to see how well it could replicate the analysis example
> which was a nice example of web data scraping!
>
> The data is the length of a series of programs written in a number of
> languages (data from: http://rosettacode.org/wiki/Rosetta_Code).
> (The columns don't map well to text only, Haskell column marked with ≡≡≡≡
> (Why doesn't this list support HTML?)).
> See nicer version at: http://pastehtml.com/view/ciy7woohv.rtxt
>
> The average for Haskell of 1.89 means that on the average the same program
> in Haskell takes ~2x in the other languages.
> Given the correlation of size to clarity, complexity, effort, and errors,
> this is a good thing! :-)
>
> Code Size relative to Mathematica
> Larger numbers indicate that the language on top needs more code.
>
> C C++ Fortran Java CLisp Python C# JavaScript
> R MATLAB Clojure Pascal Haskell Ruby Average
> ??????????? ???? ???? ???? ???? ????
> ???? ???? ???? ???? ???? ???? ???? ≡≡≡≡ ????
> Mathematica 17.0 9.1 8.1 6.4 6.3 7.2
> 6.4 5.0 3.2 3.2 1.6 5.8 3.5 5.2 6.29
> Ruby 2.7 1.8 1.9 1.3 1.1 1.1
> 1.5 1.0 0.7 0.9 0.4 1.4 0.7 1.27
> Haskell 3.6 2.7 2.5 2.0 1.6 1.7 2.2
> 1.5 1.1 1.5 0.7 2.1 1.4 1.89
> Pascal 2.2 1.5 1.2 0.8 0.8 0.8
> 1.0 0.8 0.5 0.6 0.2 0.5 0.7 0.89
> Clojure 8.8 5.3 5.2 3.6 3.7 3.3 3.8
> 2.5 1.9 2.9 5.0 1.5 2.6 3.85
> MATLAB 3.6 2.4 1.8 1.1 1.4 1.1 1.7
> 0.9 0.8 0.3 1.6 0.7 1.1 1.42
> R 4.7 3.3 2.4 1.9 1.8 1.7
> 2.1 1.5 1.3 0.5 2.2 0.9 1.4 1.98
> JavaScript 2.8 2.1 1.9 1.2 1.2 1.1
> 1.6 0.7 1.1 0.4 1.3 0.7 1.0 1.31
> C# 2.0 1.4 1.3 0.9 0.8 0.8
> 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.3 1.0 0.5 0.7 0.87
> Python 2.2 1.6 1.5 1.1 0.9
> 1.2 0.9 0.6 0.9 0.3 1.3 0.6 0.9 1.07
> Common Lisp 2.8 1.8 1.6 1.3 1.1
> 1.3 0.8 0.6 0.7 0.3 1.3 0.6 0.9 1.16
> Java 2.1 1.4 1.5 0.8 0.9
> 1.1 0.8 0.5 0.9 0.3 1.2 0.5 0.8 0.98
> Fortran 1.4 1.0 0.7 0.6 0.7 0.8
> 0.5 0.4 0.6 0.2 0.8 0.4 0.5 0.66
> C++ 1.4 1.0 0.7 0.6 0.6
> 0.7 0.5 0.3 0.4 0.2 0.7 0.4 0.6 0.61
> C 0.7 0.7 0.5 0.4 0.5
> 0.5 0.4 0.2 0.3 0.1 0.5 0.3 0.4 0.41
> ???????????? ???? ???? ???? ???? ???? ????
> ???? ???? ???? ???? ???? ???? ≡≡≡≡ ????
> Overall: 4.1 2.58 2.3 1.68 1.56 1.61
> 1.85 1.27 0.85 1.14 0.41 1.86 0.83 1.29
>
> Overall Ranking:
> Clojure 0.41
> Haskell 0.83
> R 0.85
> MATLAB 1.14
> JavaScript 1.27
> Ruby 1.36
> Common Lisp 1.56
> Python 1.61
> C++ 1.68
> C# 1.85
> Pascal 1.86
> Fortran 2.33
> C++ 2.58
> C 4.09
> -------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Haskell-Cafe mailing list
> Haskell-Cafe at haskell.org
> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
>
--
Feng, Boqun
School of Software,Shanghai Jiao Tong University
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/haskell-cafe/attachments/20121120/7a02db10/attachment.htm>
More information about the Haskell-Cafe
mailing list