[Haskell-cafe] HPC question

[David Turner]

On 23/05/2012 11:22, Andres Löh wrote:
> I've not looked at the .tix file, but a few tests seem to confirm what
> I'd suspect. For derived instances, you have to cover *all* methods,
> otherwise the type class will be shown as not covered.

Ok, I see. It's going to take me a while to cover all instances of this!

> For the datatype, your use of field labels causes GHC to generate
> accessor functions. These aren't covered by your tests. Therefore the
> datatype shows as not completely covered.

Ah, yes, that makes sense.

Thanks,

David

-- 
David Turner
Senior Consultant
Tracsis PLC

Tracsis PLC is a company registered in
England and Wales with number 5019106.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4922 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/haskell-cafe/attachments/20120523/43c370d9/attachment.bin>