[Haskell-cafe] What is the difference between runhaskell and compile?

[Magicloud Magiclouds]

OK. Finally this problem totally prevents my project from working.
By some guy's suggestion, I did a packet capturing, which really
showed a difference.
The rwdc file is for a ldap that at our IDC, which did not work with
compiled binary. The rodc file is for a ldap that at local, which
worked all the time. Each file contains two parts of records, at 3.*
sec and 6/7.* sec. The 3.* part is for runhaskell way. The 6/7.* part
is for compiled binary way.
The big difference here is: the failed one sent unbindRequest before
got bindResponse success.
Just a clue, I have no idea what is going on....

On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 5:17 PM, Chris Dornan <chris at chrisdornan.com> wrote:
> No problem -- I have attached the executable too.
>
> Chris
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Magicloud Magiclouds [mailto:magicloud.magiclouds at gmail.com]
> Sent: 01 June 2012 02:01
> To: Chris Dornan
> Subject: Re: [Haskell-cafe] What is the difference between runhaskell and compile?
>
> I see.
> Although I am using a UTF-8 environment, but all string I was using were ASCIIs.
> If it is not too much trouble, may I have your LDAP compiled library files? I think since the Main.o is identical, maybe the libraries are different.
>
> On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 2:09 PM, Chris Dornan <chris at chrisdornan.com> wrote:
>> I wouldn't pay too much attention to the fact that the hash tags are
>> different -- they are very unlikely to be the same across two
>> installations. (For example, my GHC installations are relocated under
>> /usr/hs, immediately changing the contents of all of the .conf files
>> and therefore the hashes.)
>>
>> The object files are more interesting, and they are identical!
>>
>> At the moment I can only explain what we are seeing by assuming that some change has affected the GHC 7.4.1 runtime system -- but only for compiled programs.
>>
>> Are you using non-ASCII characters in your LDAP passwords? I am thinking that maybe the compiled 7.4.1 could be using a different LOCALE from everything else, leading in some way to the passwords being encoded differently en route to the LDAP server. I don't know whether this could actually happen, but it is the kind of mechanism that seem most likely to be causing the problem.
>>
>> Did you try to running the variants that read address, account and passwords from standard input? Did it show the same perverse behaviour?
>>
>> Chris
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Magicloud Magiclouds [mailto:magicloud.magiclouds at gmail.com]
>> Sent: 31 May 2012 02:47
>> To: Chris Dornan
>> Subject: Re: [Haskell-cafe] What is the difference between runhaskell and compile?
>>
>> Hi,
>>  I have compared the files. The .o-es are exactly the same. The .hi-s are different.
>>  The interface hash, flag hash, and "import  -/ LDAP-0.6.6:LDAP.Constants xxxxx(hash)" are different.
>>  I do not know why only this module (LDAP.Constants) has a different hash. I am not quite familiar with ghc compiling process. May I know your conclusion?
>>
>> On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 3:50 PM, Chris Dornan <chris at chrisdornan.com> wrote:
>>> Did you carry out a standard (optimised) build to get ghc-7.4.1?
>>>
>>> Are you going to try the justhub rpms or compare the object/header files I sent.
>>>
>>> Chris
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Magicloud Magiclouds [mailto:magicloud.magiclouds at gmail.com]
>>> Sent: 30 May 2012 04:07
>>> To: Chris Dornan
>>> Cc: Haskell-Cafe
>>> Subject: Re: [Haskell-cafe] What is the difference between runhaskell and compile?
>>>
>>> A little information.
>>> I did not notice the gcc/binutils versions. But in CentOS, the ghc
>>> 7.2.2/7.4.1 were all compiled myself with all default configurations.
>>>
>>> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 10:54 PM, Chris Dornan <chris at chrisdornan.com> wrote:
>>>> On 29 May 2012 02:21, Magicloud Magiclouds
>>>> <magicloud.magiclouds at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> Interesting. I have this code tested in Debian unstable/stable,
>>>>> CentOS 6.1, all 64 bit, with two different version of libldap2.
>>>>> At first, Debian-s were installed with 7.4.1, CentOS with 7.2.2.
>>>>> Only in CentOS the code connected after compiled.
>>>>> Then I removed 7.4.1 from Debian stable and installed 7.2.2. The code worked.
>>>>> At last, I installed 7.4.1 in CentOS. The code did not work.
>>>>>
>>>>> Could you send the .hi/.o to me, so maybe I could find out the
>>>>> different? Also the exact original source.
>>>>> Thank you.
>>>>
>>>> Interesting indeed! I am guessing that you are using the GHC-7.4.1
>>>> bindist from haskell.org.
>>>>
>>>> I will try and find some time to marshal the source code and
>>>> intermediate files (am on the road -- will need to collect it from
>>>> base, make it generic etc.).
>>>>
>>>> You might also like to try the http://justhub.org ghc-7.4.1-hub on
>>>> your CentOS-6.1 node. It is a separate build from the haskell.org
>>>> bindist and comes with it's own in-board gcc (4.6.1) and binutils
>>>> (2.21) used for the build. It should work for you.
>>>>
>>>> (You could also try ghc-7.4.2-RC1-hub.)
>>>>
>>>> Chris
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> 竹密岂妨流水过
>>> 山高哪阻野云飞
>>>
>>> And for G+, please use magiclouds#gmail.com.
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> 竹密岂妨流水过
>> 山高哪阻野云飞
>>
>> And for G+, please use magiclouds#gmail.com.
>>
>
>
>
> --
> 竹密岂妨流水过
> 山高哪阻野云飞
>
> And for G+, please use magiclouds#gmail.com.



-- 
竹密岂妨流水过
山高哪阻野云飞

And for G+, please use magiclouds#gmail.com.