[Haskell-cafe] Some thoughts on Type-Directed Name Resolution

AntC anthony_clayden at clear.net.nz
Mon Feb 20 04:41:23 CET 2012

> I'm proposing my record fields so that selectors are just functions. Then
> independent of dot notation. (It's the semantics I'm far more concerned
> with.) 

Folks, I've put my 'Record in Haskell' proposal on the wiki
http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/Records  as suggestion 5 Declared
Overloaded Record Fields.

Thanks to the voiciferousness on this thread, dot notation is completely

Feedback welcome.


View this message in context: http://haskell.1045720.n5.nabble.com/Some-thoughts-on-Type-Directed-Name-Resolution-tp5280846p5498073.html
Sent from the Haskell - Haskell-Cafe mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

More information about the Haskell-Cafe mailing list