[Haskell-cafe] Some thoughts on Type-Directed Name Resolution

[AntC]

> I'm proposing my record fields so that selectors are just functions. Then
it's 
> independent of dot notation. (It's the semantics I'm far more concerned
> with.) 

Folks, I've put my 'Record in Haskell' proposal on the wiki
http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/Records  as suggestion 5 Declared
Overloaded Record Fields.

Thanks to the voiciferousness on this thread, dot notation is completely
optional.

Feedback welcome.

AntC

--
View this message in context: http://haskell.1045720.n5.nabble.com/Some-thoughts-on-Type-Directed-Name-Resolution-tp5280846p5498073.html
Sent from the Haskell - Haskell-Cafe mailing list archive at Nabble.com.