[Haskell-cafe] Object Oriented programming for Functional Programmers

[Brandon Allbery]

On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 4:26 PM, Rico Moorman <rico.moorman at gmail.com>wrote:

> We should first examine the merits and limitations of the traditional
>> approach: using
>> functions as a basis for the architecture of software systems. This will
>> not only lead us to
>>
>

> Because you both have more experience with this piece of literature, how
> would you interpret it? With a grain of salt or would function really mean
> procedure from the viewpoint of the author?
>

"Procedures".  They're coming at it from the standpoint of C / Algol /
Pascal, where "functions" are more or less your only real way to organize
code; not talking about functional programming.

-- 
brandon s allbery kf8nh                               sine nomine associates
allbery.b at gmail.com                                  ballbery at sinenomine.net
unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad        http://sinenomine.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/haskell-cafe/attachments/20121231/aaa0ed4a/attachment.htm>