[Haskell-cafe] Hackage suggestion: Gather the list of the licenses of all dependencies of a package
Felipe Almeida Lessa
felipe.lessa at gmail.com
Thu Dec 13 15:12:11 CET 2012
While you're at it, maybe whitelisting cpphs would be nice as well =).
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 12:03 PM, Michael Snoyman <michael at snoyman.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 3:53 PM, Vincent Hanquez <tab at snarc.org> wrote:
>>
>> On 12/13/2012 12:51 PM, Michael Snoyman wrote:
>>>
>>> I think that's a great idea. I just implemented this on PackDeps:
>>>
>>> http://packdeps.haskellers.com/licenses
>>>
>>> As with all features on that site, I'll be happy to deprecate it as soon
>>> as Hackage incorporates the feature in the future.
>>
>>
>> awesome Michael !
>>
>> However i think ithis shouldn't take dependencies from tests and
>> benchmarks.
>> This doesn't make differences for the "overall" license that the library
>> "exposes".
>>
>> --
>> Vincent
>
>
> Hmm, that's a good point. I'll admit I hadn't really thought this through,
> but I can actually see an argument going both ways on this:
>
> * Viral licenses won't actually affect you if they're just used for test
> suites.
> * But company lawyers will probably be nervous about it anyway.
>
> Nonetheless, I think you have the right of it. Unless people say otherwise,
> I'm going to implement Vincent's change.
>
> Michael
>
> _______________________________________________
> Haskell-Cafe mailing list
> Haskell-Cafe at haskell.org
> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
>
--
Felipe.
More information about the Haskell-Cafe
mailing list