[Haskell-cafe] Is there any movement/need in new 'base' package and co?

[Stephen Tetley]

Haskell 2010 avoided library revisions - 12 years had elapsed since
the last language definition and updating the language was deemed the
priority. There have been suggestions on the Libraries list that the
next major language revision should also look at the core libraries.



On 2 December 2012 18:59, Евгений Пермяков <permeakra at gmail.com> wrote:
> So, the questions arise:
> - When problems will ruin the language?
> - When and which actions are needed to avoid this?
> - If major rewrite will be initiated, what problems it should target?
> - And how to make the transition easier?
>