[Haskell-cafe] Fwd: 'let' keyword optional in do notation?

Tillmann Rendel rendel at informatik.uni-marburg.de
Thu Aug 9 10:35:13 CEST 2012


Martijn Schrage wrote:
>> Would expanding each let-less binding to a separate let "feel" more
>> sound to you?
> That was actually my first idea, but then two declarations at the same
> level will not be in the same binding group, so
> do x = y
>    y = 1
> would not compile. This would create a difference with all the other
> places where bindings may appear.

But it would be in line with <- bindings in the do notation, so maybe it 
wouldn't feel so wrong.


More information about the Haskell-Cafe mailing list