[Haskell-cafe] Fwd: 'let' keyword optional in do notation?
rendel at informatik.uni-marburg.de
Thu Aug 9 10:35:13 CEST 2012
Martijn Schrage wrote:
>> Would expanding each let-less binding to a separate let "feel" more
>> sound to you?
> That was actually my first idea, but then two declarations at the same
> level will not be in the same binding group, so
> do x = y
> y = 1
> would not compile. This would create a difference with all the other
> places where bindings may appear.
But it would be in line with <- bindings in the do notation, so maybe it
wouldn't feel so wrong.
More information about the Haskell-Cafe