[Haskell-cafe] Fwd: 'let' keyword optional in do notation?

Simon Hengel sol at typeful.net
Wed Aug 8 19:01:27 CEST 2012

On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 12:22:39PM -0400, David Feuer wrote:
> Changing scoping rules based on whether things are right next to each
> other? No thanks.

Would expanding each let-less binding to a separate let "feel" more
sound to you?


More information about the Haskell-Cafe mailing list