[Haskell-cafe] instance Enum Double considered not entirely great?

[Ivan Lazar Miljenovic]

On 29 September 2011 07:56, Roman Leshchinskiy <rl at cse.unsw.edu.au> wrote:
> On 25/09/2011, at 18:20, Chris Smith wrote:
>
>> class Ord a => Range a where
>>    rangeFromTo :: a -> a -> [a] -- subsumes Ix.range / Enum.enumFromTo
>>    rangeFromThenTo :: a -> a -> a -> [a]
>>    inRange   :: (a, a) -> a -> Bool
>> -- Does have instances for Float/Double.  List ranges desugar to this.
>> -- Also has instances for tuples
>>
>> class Range a => InfiniteRange a where -- [1]
>>    rangeFrom :: a -> [a]
>>    rangeFromThen :: a -> a -> [a]
>> -- Has instances for Float/Double
>> -- No instances for tuples
>
> I realise I'm slightly late to the discussion but IMO, the rangeFrom* (or enumFrom*) functions shouldn't be methods. Rather, a redesign of Enum should ensure that they can be defined generically for all types. The rationale is that other data structures (like arrays) want to provide similar functions without having to go through lists.

Wouldn't this require something like the ListLike class?

-- 
Ivan Lazar Miljenovic
Ivan.Miljenovic at gmail.com
IvanMiljenovic.wordpress.com