[Haskell-cafe] Package documentation complaints -- and a suggestion
ketil at malde.org
Tue Oct 25 16:24:24 CEST 2011
Max Rabkin <max.rabkin at gmail.com> writes:
> This is useful information, but to call it "stability" is not only
> misleading, but it also prevents the package from using that field to
> indicate whether or not it is stable!
Oh, right - I'm not much interested in the stability of a package. What
I want to know, is which package to choose for some purpose. By
highlighting stuff that is correlated with usefulness, I'll be able to
make a quicker, more informed decision.
Separating this from stability is a feature, not a bug, since it frees
the author to label the package stable or not - instead of encouraging
using "stable" to mean "please use". :-)
If I haven't seen further, it is by standing in the footprints of giants
More information about the Haskell-Cafe