[Haskell-cafe] hello Haskell

[Tom Murphy]

Blocking/unsubscribing people based on their email provider seems... sort of
impolite or unwelcoming.
A greylist could work.
Given the relatively low volume of spam, my vote is for the original
suggestion of first-message-moderated, with the ability to put an address
back on moderation if their account is hacked.

Tom / amindfv
On Oct 23, 2011 11:09 PM, "Conrad Parker" <conrad at metadecks.org> wrote:

> On 24 October 2011 10:57, Daniel Fischer
> <daniel.is.fischer at googlemail.com> wrote:
> > On Monday 24 October 2011, 03:54:09, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
> >> R J wrote:
> >> > hey Haskell this is nuts http://www.business10i.com
> >> > hey Haskell this is nuts xxxx://xxx.xxxxxxxxxxx.xxx
> >>
> >> Maybe its time to moderate all newcomers to this list, at least
> >> until they post one non-spam message to the list.
> >
> > Just for the record, not a newcomer, and has non-spam messages, e.g.
> >
> > http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/haskell-cafe/2010-May/077871.html
> > http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/haskell-cafe/2010-May/078054.html
>
> There was a recent hotmail exploit, with people reporting their
> account sent spam, see eg:
>
> https://plus.google.com/117020778736538274606/posts/4yMP7iDshCf
>
> I'd be in favor of graylisting or unsubscribing anyone who uses hotmail.
>
> Conrad.
>
> >
> >>
> >> If you need volunteers to do this moderation I'll stick my hand up.
> >>
> >> Erik
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Haskell-Cafe mailing list
> > Haskell-Cafe at haskell.org
> > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Haskell-Cafe mailing list
> Haskell-Cafe at haskell.org
> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/haskell-cafe/attachments/20111023/721657a6/attachment.htm>