[Haskell-cafe] pool: Why doesn't it block?
Edward Z. Yang
ezyang at MIT.EDU
Sun Jun 12 11:17:03 CEST 2011
Oops, my bad! :-)
Cheers,
Edward
Excerpts from Michael Snoyman's message of Sun Jun 12 05:15:41 -0400 2011:
> Wrong package, that's resource-pool (which I wasn't aware of until
> this moment). Ertugrul is referring to pool:
> http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/pool/0.1.0.2/doc/html/Data-Pool.html
> .
>
> My original intention of splitting pool off from persistent was so
> others could use it. If Bryan's maintaining resource-pool instead, I'd
> have no problem deprecating pool and using resource-pool in its place.
>
> Michael
>
> On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 12:06 PM, Edward Z. Yang <ezyang at mit.edu> wrote:
> > The documentation seems to indicate that the behaviour should be blocking,
> > so if it's not, might be a bug.
> >
> >> withResource :: MonadCatchIO m => Pool a -> (a -> m b) -> m b
> >> Temporarily take a resource from a Pool, perform an action with it, and
> >> return it to the pool afterwards.
> >> ....
> >> * If the maximum number of resources has been reached, this function blocks
> >> until a resource becomes available.
> >
> > http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/resource-pool/0.1.1.0/doc/html/Data-Pool.html
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Edward
> >
> > Excerpts from Ertugrul Soeylemez's message of Sun Jun 12 03:47:37 -0400 2011:
> >> Hello Michael, hello fellow haskellers,
> >>
> >> there is something, which has bothered me for quite a while, but now it
> >> has become a serious problem for me, because I see it as a bug, and
> >> there is no elegant way to work around it.
> >>
> >> I wonder if it's the right semantics for Data.Pool to simply fail with
> >> an exception, if the pool is exhausted. It would be much more
> >> appropriate, if it would just block, until a resource becomes available.
> >> Otherwise it's just /safe/ for multi-threading, but not really /useful/
> >> for it.
> >>
> >> I noticed this when I launched 512 worker threads, but my pool had only
> >> 16 database connections. I need the pool to block, until a resource is
> >> available.
> >>
> >> It's also common that my Yesod site just returns an internal server
> >> error, when the pool is exhausted, so you can only handle as many
> >> connections successfully as there are database connections. I would
> >> expect Yesod to wait for a connection to become available instead of
> >> simply blowing the request.
> >>
> >> Blocking should at least be an option and be somehow reachable from
> >> Yesod/persistent.
> >>
> >>
> >> Greets,
> >> Ertugrul
> >>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Haskell-Cafe mailing list
> > Haskell-Cafe at haskell.org
> > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
> >
More information about the Haskell-Cafe
mailing list