[Haskell-cafe] Faster timeout but is it correct?

[Felipe Almeida Lessa]

On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 9:04 PM, Bas van Dijk <v.dijk.bas at gmail.com> wrote:
> The most representative busyWontTimeout benchmark is the interesting
> one. Both the old and new score similarly while the event-manager
> based timeout is a modest 1.6 x faster. Since this is the most
> representative benchmark I'm beginning to favour this implementation.

That's nice, as it is also simpler than 'new'.

> Thanks for reading my rambling,

Analysis of our core libraries are always great!

Thanks,

-- 
Felipe.