[Haskell-cafe] GHC 7.4: Expected behavior or bug?
Bas van Dijk
v.dijk.bas at gmail.com
Tue Dec 27 18:24:21 CET 2011
On 27 December 2011 17:47, Bas van Dijk <v.dijk.bas at gmail.com> wrote:
> I fixed a similar breakage in the hmatrix library:
>
> https://github.com/AlbertoRuiz/hmatrix/commit/a4f38eb196209436f72b938f6355f6e28474bef3
GHC-7.4.1-rc1 also reported another type error in code that was
accepted by GHC <= 7.2.2. These were the type errors I got:
[24 of 36] Compiling Numeric.LinearAlgebra.Algorithms (
lib/Numeric/LinearAlgebra/Algorithms.hs,
dist/build/Numeric/LinearAlgebra/Algorithms.o )
lib/Numeric/LinearAlgebra/Algorithms.hs:576:23:
No instance for (RealFrac (RealOf t0))
arising from a use of `floor'
Possible fix:
add an instance declaration for (RealFrac (RealOf t0))
In the expression: floor
In the second argument of `($)', namely
`floor $ logBase 2 $ pnorm Infinity m'
In the expression: max 0 $ floor $ logBase 2 $ pnorm Infinity m
lib/Numeric/LinearAlgebra/Algorithms.hs:576:31:
No instance for (Floating (RealOf t0))
arising from a use of `logBase'
Possible fix:
add an instance declaration for (Floating (RealOf t0))
In the expression: logBase 2
In the second argument of `($)', namely
`logBase 2 $ pnorm Infinity m'
In the second argument of `($)', namely
`floor $ logBase 2 $ pnorm Infinity m'
lib/Numeric/LinearAlgebra/Algorithms.hs:576:39:
No instance for (Num (RealOf t0))
arising from the literal `2'
Possible fix: add an instance declaration for (Num (RealOf t0))
In the first argument of `logBase', namely `2'
In the expression: logBase 2
In the second argument of `($)', namely
`logBase 2 $ pnorm Infinity m'
lib/Numeric/LinearAlgebra/Algorithms.hs:576:43:
No instance for (Normed Matrix t0)
arising from a use of `pnorm'
Possible fix: add an instance declaration for (Normed Matrix t0)
In the second argument of `($)', namely `pnorm Infinity m'
In the second argument of `($)', namely
`logBase 2 $ pnorm Infinity m'
In the second argument of `($)', namely
`floor $ logBase 2 $ pnorm Infinity m'
lib/Numeric/LinearAlgebra/Algorithms.hs:593:19:
No instance for (Container Vector t0)
arising from a use of `add'
Possible fix: add an instance declaration for (Container Vector t0)
In the expression: add
In an equation for `|+|': |+| = add
In an equation for `expGolub':
expGolub m
= iterate msq f !! j
where
j = max 0 $ floor $ logBase 2 $ pnorm Infinity m
a = m */ fromIntegral ((2 :: Int) ^ j)
q = geps eps
eye = ident (rows m)
....
lib/Numeric/LinearAlgebra/Algorithms.hs:599:1:
Couldn't match type `t0' with `t'
because type variable `t' would escape its scope
This (rigid, skolem) type variable is bound by
the type signature for expm :: Field t => Matrix t -> Matrix t
The following variables have types that mention t0
expGolub :: Matrix t0 -> Matrix t0
(bound at lib/Numeric/LinearAlgebra/Algorithms.hs:575:1)
Note that RealOf is a type family:
type family RealOf x
type instance RealOf Double = Double
type instance RealOf (Complex Double) = Double
type instance RealOf Float = Float
type instance RealOf (Complex Float) = Float
Adding the following explicit type signature fixed it:
expGolub :: ( Fractional t, Element t, Field t
, Normed Matrix t
, RealFrac (RealOf t)
, Floating (RealOf t)
) => Matrix t -> Matrix t
I have no idea if this should be considered a bug.
Regards,
Bas
More information about the Haskell-Cafe
mailing list