[Haskell-cafe] If you'd design a Haskell-like language, what would you do different?

Andrew Cowie andrew at operationaldynamics.com
Wed Dec 21 03:05:18 CET 2011


On Tue, 2011-12-20 at 16:53 -0500, Matthew Farkas-Dyck wrote:
> Two of three ain't bad (^_~)

Now we just need λ to replace \, → to replace ->, and ≠ to replace /=
(which still looks like division assignment no matter how hard I squint
my eyes. 25 years of C and C derived languages is hard to forget).

Hey, forget replacing, wouldn't it be wonderful if the compiler would
just accept them as synonyms?

AfC
Sydney





More information about the Haskell-Cafe mailing list