[Haskell-cafe] Alternative versus Monoid
Yves Parès
limestrael at gmail.com
Fri Dec 16 16:26:33 CET 2011
"1) What about the First type? Do we {-# DEPRECATE #-} it?"
Personnaly, I'm in favor of following the same logic than Int:
Int itself is *not *a monoid. You have to be specific: it's either Sum or
Mult.
It should be the same for Maybe: we remove its instance of Monoid, and we
only use First and Last.
2011/12/16 Bas van Dijk <v.dijk.bas at gmail.com>
> On 16 December 2011 05:26, Brent Yorgey <byorgey at seas.upenn.edu> wrote:
> > I, for one, would be
> > quite in favor of changing the current Monoid (Maybe a) instance to
> > correspond to the failure-and-prioritized-choice semantics
>
> So lets do this. Some questions:
>
> 1) What about the First type? Do we {-# DEPRECATE #-} it?
>
> 2) What about the Last type? It could be deprecated in favor of Dual.
>
> 3) Do we need a new type (like the current Maybe) for lifting
> semigroups into a Monoid? IMHO we don't since the semigroup package
> does a better job with the Option type (like Brent mentioned).
>
> 4) How much code will break from this change?
>
> 5) Anyone up for proposing this to libraries at haskell.org?
>
> Regards,
>
> Bas
>
> _______________________________________________
> Haskell-Cafe mailing list
> Haskell-Cafe at haskell.org
> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/haskell-cafe/attachments/20111216/3f3c6116/attachment.htm>
More information about the Haskell-Cafe
mailing list