[Haskell-cafe] Re: Re: [Haskell] ANNOUNCE: reference 0.1

[Maciej Piechotka]

On Tue, 2010-09-07 at 20:36 +0200, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
> Why not to define it for any monad, for example STM (TVars) and
> whatever?

I'm really sorry but I fail to see what does 'it' refers to. reference
0.1 contains at this moment definitions for:

- Reference TVar STM
- Reference IORef IO
- Reference MVar IO
- Reference (STRef s) (ST s)

(http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/reference/0.1/doc/html/Data-Reference.html#t:Reference)

So in fact there is already support for STM/TVar pair.

Regards

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/haskell-cafe/attachments/20100907/12a0b6b1/attachment.bin